Amazon Coding Question – Solved

7 Live
In this problem, you are given an integer array, and you need to perform some operations on the array to make all the elements equal to 0. In one operation, you can select a prefix of the given array and increment or decrement all the elements of the prefix by 1. You have an array, arr, consisting of n integers. Find the minimum number of operations required to convert every element of this array to 0. A prefix is a contiguous group of items that includes the first element in the array. For example, [1], [1, 2], [1, 2, 3], etc., are prefixes of [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Note: It is guaranteed that it is always possible to convert every element of the array to 0. Example: arr = [3, 2, 1]

Asked in: Amazon

Image of the Question

Question Image

All Testcases Passed ✔



Passcode Image

Solution


def getMinimumOperations(cart):
    n = len(cart)
    curr = 0
    ops = 0
// ... rest of solution available after purchase

🔒 Please login to view the solution

Explanation


```
To solve the problem of converting an array into all zeros using a minimum number of prefix increment or decrement operations, first clearly understand the nature of the operations and their cumulative effect on the array elements.

Step 1: Understand the operation and its impact
- You can select any prefix (the first k elements for some k between 1 and n) and either increment or decrement all elements in that prefix by 1 in a single operation.
- After a sequence of such operations, the goal is to make every element zero.
- The order of operations matters, but each operation applies uniformly to the chosen prefix.

Step 2: Analyze the effect of operations on elements
- Because each operation affects a prefix, every element at position i is affected by operations performed on prefixes of length >= i.
- Therefore, the ith element’s final value (which should be zero) depends on the cumulative effect of all operations applied to prefixes that include it.
- We can think of the problem as adjusting the array step-by-step, zeroing out elements from left to right by considering how prefix operations impact them.

Step 3: Identify the relationship between consecutive elements
- Consider the difference between consecutive elements in the array.
- The key insight is that to change the value at position i, you need to consider the operations affecting prefixes including i.
- Since the operation affects prefixes, if you move from the start to the end of the array and track how the elements change relative to the previous element, you can understand the necessary increments or decrements.

Step 4: Translate the problem into tracking differences
- The number of operations needed to fix the first element is the absolute value of arr[0] because it needs to be incremented or decremented to zero.
- For subsequent elements, think in terms of how the array element changes compared to the previous element after operations.
- The difference between arr[i] and arr[i-1] tells how much you must adjust the prefix up to i to ensure that arr[i] is eventually zero.
- Each change in difference corresponds to a number of prefix operations needed.

Step 5: Calculate operations by summing absolute differences
- The minimal number of operations can be derived by summing the absolute values of:
- The first element arr[0] (to bring it to zero)
- The differences between consecutive elements (arr[i] - arr[i-1]) for all i from 1 to n-1
- Each such difference indicates how many operations are required to "shift" the prefix from length i-1 to length i.

Step 6: Intuition behind this calculation
- Consider that the array starts as [3, 2, 1].
- The first element requires 3 operations to be zeroed (either 3 decrements or increments).
- To adjust the second element, which is 2, and considering that the first element is already changed, you need to consider the difference (2 - 3 = -1), meaning a change in prefix operations to shift the prefix operation count.
- Similarly, for the third element, the difference from the second element guides the operations required.
- Summing all these absolute changes gives the minimal count of operations.

Step 7: Why this works efficiently
- This method leverages the fact that prefix operations affect multiple elements simultaneously, and differences between elements reveal the incremental changes needed in operations.
- It avoids brute force or simulating each operation step-by-step, which would be computationally expensive.
- By converting the problem to calculating the sum of absolute values of the first element and consecutive differences, you achieve an O(n) time complexity solution.

Step 8: Confirm with examples
- For arr = [3, 2, 1]:
- operations needed for first element = |3| = 3
- difference between second and first = 2 - 3 = -1 → | -1 | = 1 operation
- difference between third and second = 1 - 2 = -1 → | -1 | = 1 operation
- total operations = 3 + 1 + 1 = 5 operations minimum
- This matches the minimal number of operations required to reduce the array to zero.

Step 9: Summarize the approach
- The solution revolves around a clever observation about how prefix operations cumulatively change the array.
- By converting the problem into tracking and summing the absolute differences of consecutive elements, the complexity reduces drastically.
- This approach also neatly fits the requirement that all elements must eventually become zero with minimal steps.
- It emphasizes understanding the problem through the lens of differences and cumulative operations rather than direct simulation.

In conclusion, the approach to solve the problem efficiently involves:
- Viewing operations as cumulative changes to prefixes,
- Recognizing the importance of differences between consecutive elements,
- Summing the absolute values of the first element and these differences to find the minimum number of prefix operations needed.
This understanding leads to a straightforward and optimal solution.
```


Related Questions