Asked in: MICROSOFT
def solve(arr):
result = set()
prev = dict()
for num in arr:
// ... rest of solution available after purchase
```
To solve this problem, you need to identify all distinct scores obtained by performing a bitwise-OR on every strictly increasing subsequence of the given array, including the empty subsequence which contributes a score of 0. The main challenge lies in efficiently exploring subsequences and combining their bitwise-OR values without enumerating all subsequences explicitly, which would be computationally infeasible for larger arrays.
---
Step 1: Understanding the Problem and Key Concepts
- A strictly increasing subsequence is a sequence of elements taken from the array in order, where each element is strictly greater than the previous one.
- The score for any subsequence is the bitwise-OR of all elements in that subsequence.
- We want to find all distinct possible scores, including the score of the empty subsequence (0).
- The input array size can be up to 10^4, which makes naive enumeration of all subsequences impossible due to exponential complexity.
- Each element is less than 1024, so the numbers are at most 10 bits long, allowing bitwise operations to be done efficiently.
---
Step 2: Naive Approach and Its Limitations
The simplest but impractical approach would be:
- Generate all strictly increasing subsequences.
- For each subsequence, calculate the bitwise-OR of its elements.
- Collect these results into a set to get distinct scores.
- Finally, sort the set and return.
However, since the number of subsequences grows exponentially with n, this approach is not feasible for n=10,000.
---
Step 3: Identifying Opportunities for Optimization
- Notice that the problem can be broken down into dynamic programming where at each position you keep track of achievable scores.
- Instead of considering subsequences explicitly, think about the scores that can be formed ending at each element.
- Because the subsequence must be strictly increasing, you can only append the current element to subsequences that ended with a smaller element.
- The bitwise-OR operation is associative and monotonic in terms of bits being set; combining OR results can produce new scores without enumerating every subsequence.
---
Step 4: Developing a Dynamic Programming Approach
- Initialize a global set of scores that will eventually contain all possible distinct scores (start with {0} for the empty subsequence).
- Process the array from left to right.
- For each element at position i:
- Maintain a temporary set for new scores formed by appending the current element to subsequences ending at previous indices where arr[j] < arr[i].
- These new scores are formed by bitwise-OR of the current element with the scores achievable from previous elements smaller than it.
- Merge these new scores into the global set.
- To make this efficient:
- You can maintain, for each position, the set of achievable scores ending exactly at that position.
- For each position i, you try to extend subsequences ending at positions j < i where arr[j] < arr[i].
- Since n can be up to 10,000 and naive nested loops may still be costly, optimizations around data structures or bitmasks can be considered.
---
Step 5: Further Insights and Possible Optimizations
- Because arr[i] < 1024, scores can be represented using integers up to 10 bits.
- This allows using bitmasks and sets efficiently.
- Instead of keeping track of all sequences ending at each element, think of tracking all possible scores at each step globally.
- A possible approach is:
- Start with a set of scores = {0}.
- Iterate over the array.
- For each element, create a new set of scores by OR-ing the element with each existing score but only if the element can be appended to subsequences that respect the strictly increasing order.
- To enforce the strictly increasing condition, you can use a data structure or logic to ensure that scores only propagate from smaller elements to larger elements.
- One way to handle this is:
- At each step, maintain a mapping from values to the set of scores achievable with subsequences ending with that value.
- When you move to a new element arr[i], consider all smaller keys from this mapping and OR their scores with arr[i].
- This is akin to doing a form of DP where keys are the last element values of subsequences.
---
Step 6: Summary of Steps to Implement
1. Initialize a data structure (e.g., a dictionary or map) to hold, for each distinct value, the set of scores achievable by subsequences ending with that value. Initially empty.
2. Initialize a global set with the empty subsequence score: {0}.
3. Iterate through each element in the array in order.
4. For the current element:
- Find all entries in the map where the key (previous element) is less than the current element (to satisfy strictly increasing condition).
- For each such key, take the scores stored, OR each with the current element, and add the results to a temporary set representing new subsequence scores ending with the current element.
- Also consider the current element alone as a subsequence (score = current element).
- Update the map entry for the current element with the union of existing and new scores.
- Add all new scores to the global set.
5. After processing all elements, convert the global set to a sorted list.
6. Return the sorted list as the final answer.
---
Step 7: Handling the Empty Subsequence
- Remember to include 0 in the final set to represent the empty subsequence.
- This can be added at the start and carried along without modification.
---
Step 8: Time and Space Considerations
- The complexity depends on how many distinct scores are produced at each step and how many smaller keys exist.
- Since numbers are bounded by 1024, the map keys and scores are limited, reducing complexity.
- Using appropriate data structures like sorted maps or balanced trees may help quickly query keys less than the current element.
---
Step 9: Verification With Examples
- Use the provided examples to verify your reasoning:
- For arr = [4,2,4,1], verify that you get scores [0,1,2,4,6].
- For arr = [3,2,4,6], verify that you get scores [0,2,3,4,6,7].
This stepwise dynamic programming approach efficiently captures all distinct scores achievable by strictly increasing subsequences while avoiding exponential enumeration.
```